3 ms·
I may be misreading this comment, but it feels a little stuck up. Arch is created for Arch developers. This is well-known and they have never hidden that. The w
by 5e92cb50239222b 4y ago
I may be misreading this comment, but it feels a little stuck up. Arch is created for Arch developers. This is well-known and they have never hidden that. The wiki states as much somewhere in the installation guide. That the distribution turned out to be useful to many others is purely coincidental. If you tried it and decided you're not one of them, no need to pour shit on devs as if they owed you something and didn't fill their part of the bargain.
- wing-_-nuts 4y agoI agree, it is a little stuck up, on the part of the elitist devs. If this was a little hobbiest distro, I'd agree with you, but this is one of the most popular distros out there. There is a certain expectation of competency and quality. I would argue that shipping the master branch of a bootloader isn't competent when there are stable releases available, and not addressing the issue when literally thousands of users are having the problem isn't very respectful of your userbase. FWIW, I did eventually fix it, but the endeavour os folks were much more understanding and helpful with the issue. The arrogance I saw on r/arch was insane and offputting.