4 ms·
Personally, I am growing comfortable with Windows Subsystem for Linux. Performance is fine for emacs, I don't have to worry about device drivers, I can run any
by elif 4y ago
Personally, I am growing comfortable with Windows Subsystem for Linux.
Performance is fine for emacs, I don't have to worry about device drivers, I can run any form of application, I can treat the windows hypervisor as a remote client or as a VM for isolation purposes, I can run multiple versions of Linux, even at the same time, and it isn't as clunky and slow as using a traditional VM like virtualbox.
The only thing that makes me jealous is when this post talks about quiet fans, and the battery benefits of Linux.
Edit: I forgot to add one more benefit I ran into recently. If you need one version of a library or or tool for one project, and another version for another project, you don't have to monkey around with path scripts and bashrc to replace versions on the fly, you can just have an ideal environment for each project.
- seabrookmx 4y ago> battery benefits of Linux In my experience, battery life under windows is far superior due to more mature drivers. I'm lucky to get 4hrs out of my Framework laptop (with the i5-1240p) whereas Windows nets 6+. And that's with a 6.x kernel that has 12th gen support (I'm running Fedora as per Framework's recommendation). My old XPS 15 had much better battery life but a similar drop (percentage wise) running Ubuntu.