4 ms·
Maybe the 10x engineer isn’t true, but I’ve worked at companies where I was on a team and my output was equal to the rest of the team combined. So if there isn
by edgyquant 4y ago
Maybe the 10x engineer isn’t true, but I’ve worked at companies where I was on a team and my output was equal to the rest of the team combined. So if there isn’t such a thing it must mean that there are 1/10X engineers and they’re prevalent.
- shagie 4y agoThis might also be a bit of Price's Law in play (not saying that you aren't a 10x developer)... https://dariusforoux.com/prices-law/ https://dariusforoux.com/prices-law/ > Price’s law says that 50% of the work is done by the square root of the total number of people who participate in the work. Price's square root law: Empirical validity and relation to Lotka's law https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0306457388900490 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/030645... (behind various paywalls) If you're on a team of 10 people, 3 of those people will be doing about half the work. And then 7 are doing the other half. If there are 10 work units, the 3 are doing 5/3 of a work unit each and the 7 are doing 5/7 of a work unit each for a ratio of 2.3x --- Yes, 1/10th developers are common - especially in larger teams. And there are also -1/2 developers too where someone will spend half their time just cleaning up after the -1/2 developer. And just with the nature of teams, larger teams are going to have a significant fraction of the team doing very little work (note: this applies to consultancy teams too and if you get a team of 20 people to work on the project, you really should just get a team of 4 and stay on top of them as it will be less work to manage).