Here's the quest: > write a hello-world service, and run "go build" [...] you'll have your single-file binary ready for deployment You seem to have written a

Here's the quest: > write a hello-world service, and run "go build" [...] you'll have your single-file binary ready for deployment You seem to have written a much simpler hello-world toy program (one that literally just prints those words and exits), instead of a "hello-world service [...] ready for deployment". (Am I mistaken? 16 seconds—on what I'm assuming is not a modestly specced workstation—is a crazy-long compile time for a simple hello-world program, but it would be pretty crazy even for a deployable service.) What happens if you attempt to satisfy the actual criteria laid out? > I believe the original claim has been substantiated enough already Uh, no. It's not substantiated until someone substantiates it. To "substantiate" something is not synonymous with merely claiming that it is true. > Demanding precise time measurement of a ballpark is where the "double standard" It's not a double standard; I didn't even ask for "precise time measurement". I asked you to substantiate what you're saying. Seeking substantiation does not comprise a separate claim in and of itself (but nice try, I guess?).