4 ms·
If food heritage is so important to the people of Italy, and they agree that lab-grown meat is vastly inferior for all of the claimed reasons, I imagine lab-gro
by 000ooo000 4y ago
If food heritage is so important to the people of Italy, and they agree that lab-grown meat is vastly inferior for all of the claimed reasons, I imagine lab-grown meat as a product would just flop. Why ban it, unless it's all just political theatre?
- cmrdporcupine 4y agoSounds like you answered your own question. Conservative national-chauvinist gov't enacts national-chauvinist legislation. It's "throwing red meat to your base" ... except actually literally, not metaphorically.
- briandear 4y agoIf “climate” is so important to the people of California, and they agree that the ICE vehicle is vastly inferior for all the claimed reasons, I imagine ICE vehicles as a product would just flop. Why ban it, unless it’s all just political theater?
- wolfi008 4y agoPollutants of your ICE are hurting others, while the taste of meat is solely on the consumer themselves. That's why you are being downvoted.
- stu2b50 4y agoNegative externalities require external interference in market economies to produce the socially optimal outcome. Climate change and pollution are clear examples of negative externalities. As it happens, the farming of meat actually has severe negative externalities in this case. If anything, it's farmed meat that should be restricted by the government in that model.
- __void 4y agobecause in government right now are far-right populists who have to distract the masses from the fact that they are not doing anything they promised in the election campaign in recent months the issues have been banning rave parties, banning documents for children of lgbt couples and war on cricket flour