> I'm sure someone who is more serious about this will say, "that's misleadingly simple!" but once you have a why and a what, the how is a work problem. loved

> I'm sure someone who is more serious about this will say, "that's misleadingly simple!" but once you have a why and a what, the how is a work problem. loved your post. I'm by far a lot less experienced for sure. There is one thing in this sentenced that stood out because my order of what to address first is always what and how. Only at the end the why (e.g motive) might or might not become visible. It has saved me from jumping to premature conclusion (or attribution) in the past ... Most "who-dunnit" genre of films are based on making you believe the why is the ultimate goal. For me though the why is a by-product of addressing the what/how and I find things remain smoother and with less rabbit holes to get lost in.