3 ms·
In a way you could use these AI systems similar to kintsugi. Or in the same way a good wood sculptor uses the flow of the wood rather than working against it.
by NovaDudely 4y ago
In a way you could use these AI systems similar to kintsugi. Or in the same way a good wood sculptor uses the flow of the wood rather than working against it.
Using AI to provide a basic frame work on which folks can iterate, manipulate or redact is not such a dystopian view of these things.
- ChatGTP 4y agoWhich would be a dream if it stops there, but it sounds like we're fairly hell bent on taking it further as fast as possible?
- bloppe 4y agoFersher
- NovaDudely 4y agoAbsolutely. If reading any of the computer technology pessimists of the last 50 years have taught me anything is that they are usually right to some degree.
- bryanrasmussen 4y agoSince Bill Gates claims he never said 640K is enough for anyone, and who doesn't trust Bill Gates - I guess I have to agree with that one.
- dclowd9901 4y agoI don’t understand what we have to gain from a system that generates code that needs human verification. It’s like Tesla’s autopilot all over again. Either it can drive itself or it can’t — if it can’t absolute, 100% reliably manage itself, why are we even pursuing it? I bet a more clever person than I could actually mathematically prove that neural network based models could never provide 100% reliable results.
- ChatGTP 4y agoFor profits? I just watched an interview with Max Tegmark from 2 years ago where he talks about "Intelligble Intelligence" and that he feels that's the way forwards, it's an awesome concept. He said what he fears the most is huge black box AI, which shows human like intelligence by throwing more hardware at it, and we keep doing that until we maybe get an AGI. Well...here we are...