3 ms·
There are plenty of valid criticisms of FCPX, but this stuff is nonsense: there are plenty of professional editors using it already. Where? I know none and I k
by Keyframe 15y ago
There are plenty of valid criticisms of FCPX, but this stuff is nonsense: there are plenty of professional editors using it already.
Where? I know none and I know hundreds of them, hundreds. Not single television network, production company, post production facility I know uses FCPX. AVID is still the king (and always has been), I see lots of FCP7 still around, and new to the production and post production sphere is Premiere, which is getting a lot of traction recently. I have even seen EDIUS around (especially RTL/Bertelsmann/Fremantle group), but I have yet to see one FCPX suite anywhere.
- alexqgb 15y agoDon't know why you're getting down-voted. This is absolutely true. And the reason that it's true is because post houses can't integrate FCP X with the rest of their workflows even if they want to. Apple inexplicably stopped supporting the exchange format that allows this to happen.