5 ms·
You're implying that open research is a shady way to become a non profit. They're allowed to change their business model. The open research was published at the
by gilgoomesh 4y ago
You're implying that open research is a shady way to become a non profit. They're allowed to change their business model. The open research was published at the time. GPT-2 is fully open source. Even GPT-3 was open source through the beta in 2020. What they didn't release was the fully trained model (the data is more valuable than the code, in this case).
- colordrops 4y agoNo one is suggesting they are doing something that isn't allowed. The poster you are replying to is allowed to criticize them.
- int_19h 4y agoLegally, yes, they can do that. Ethically, this is a very clear example of bait and switch.