3 ms·
You want people brave enough to fight meta for control of the work meta did and shared for free? It's attitudes like this that mean LLaMA will serve as a lesson
by 6gvONxR4sf7o 4y ago
You want people brave enough to fight meta for control of the work meta did and shared for free? It's attitudes like this that mean LLaMA will serve as a lesson for other companies to not share as much. It's too bad, because in normal open source, I like that the community usually tells people to abide by the license terms chosen by the authors. But in this, everyone's just demanding unrestricted use.
- A4ET8a8uTh0 4y agoThere is a real concern that this particular technology, as powerful as it is, will be kept behind the doors of the biggest corps and information gleamed from prompts will be further used to our collective detriment. I am personally still coming to terms with it, but it is not just wanting stuff. It is making sure society does not get too separated in terms of power ( because it is already pretty stratified ).
- 6gvONxR4sf7o 4y agoI agree. I think that's why it's important that the lesson isn't "if you give an inch, the community will take a mile." Otherwise, they will keep it behind closed doors.
- Zuiii 4y agoWhile they'll release useless minor models here and there, I think these companies will keep this tech behind closed doors regardless of what the community does. Humanity needs to act quick in order to avoid yet another extreme consolidation of power.
- pmoriarty 4y agoEven if they wanted to keep it behind close doors, it could easily get leaked.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]