3 ms·
> You also definitely need to think again if you think those jobs are low paying. Plenty of people make quite a healthy living doing them. Will they still make
by sp527 4y ago
> You also definitely need to think again if you think those jobs are low paying. Plenty of people make quite a healthy living doing them.
Will they still make a healthy living when there's an influx of laborers fleeing more automated parts of the economy?
GS just put out a report today estimating the impact of AI: https://www.businessinsider.com/generative-ai-chatpgt-300-million-full-time-jobs-goldman-sachs-2023-3 https://www.businessinsider.com/generative-ai-chatpgt-300-mi....
I wonder sometimes if these accounts on HN making insane arguments that generative AI somehow won't be economically calamitous are bots. In fact, if I was at OpenAI and the goal was to avert scrutiny long enough to get to AGI, unleashing a torrent of AI shill bots might be near the top of the agenda.
- pdonis 4y ago> Will they still make a healthy living when there's an influx of laborers fleeing more automated parts of the economy? Will those laborers have the skills required for those jobs? > GS just put out a report LOL--Goldman Sachs as an authoritative source on the impact of AI. > I wonder sometimes if these accounts on HN making insane arguments that generative AI somehow won't be economically calamitous are bots. You must be joking: you actually have trouble telling posts by bots from posts by humans? Even with a large number of samples? (Never mind that you can also look at the account's profile page, which will give you very useful information.)
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]