3 ms·
According to the US Copyright office's recent ruling, nothing generated by these models can be copyrighted (!), so in theory you should be fine!
by sam0x17 4y ago
According to the US Copyright office's recent ruling, nothing generated by these models can be copyrighted (!), so in theory you should be fine!
- chatmasta 4y agonit: that wasn't a "ruling" so much as it was "guidance" [0] [1] [0] https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/03/16/2023-05321/copyright-registration-guidance-works-containing-material-generated-by-artificial-intelligence https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/03/16/2023-05... [1] Discussed on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35191206 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35191206
- Zuiii 4y agoThe position of the US copyright office is based in large part on prior case law (from your first link).
- avereveard 4y agoYeah but gpt3-turbo has a "no train on our outputs" tos, so it's not just copyright.
- computerex 4y agoLet's say company A uses OpenAI models to create an open dataset, like alpaca. If company B uses that dataset to fine tune a model, is company B liable to TOS violation? Afterall, they may not even be an OpenAI customer.
- bob1029 4y agoDoes it actually? The only thing I ever saw was "don't use our models to build competing models". Which is clearly ambiguous at best when dealing with generative natural text. This also implies to me that using their models to help with fine tunes of their other offerings would be ok.
- astrange 4y agoThey're the first word on this, not the last, so it doesn't mean much. It also clearly leads to absurd results for text models, which can memorize their training data, or echo back your inputs. Or you could pass their output through a human to copyright it.
- anticensor 4y agoNot all countries have the same view on this either. A few countries, including the UK, maintain the view that the AI's operator, owner or custodian hold the copyright instead.