2 ms·
I wish it was more convincing. As it stands, it says more about the author's egoistic view of humanity than of AI. Imagine for a second taking Feuerbach's The
by kelseyfrog 4y ago
I wish it was more convincing.
As it stands, it says more about the author's egoistic view of humanity than of AI. Imagine for a second taking Feuerbach's The Essence of Religion and applying it to Descartes' rationality and Plato's nous. We'd get a critique of the rational human's construction of his own ideal - the essence of intellect.
AI threatens this ideal and ego-threats get sublimated into existential threats by those unable to understand themselves well enough to express themselves directly.
- jimrandomh 4y agoMaybe it's wrong, and things will be fine. Maybe it's right. But you can't psychoanalyze your way to truth. Whether future AIs will destroy humanity or not is a fact about future AIs, and the landscape of intelligent systems, not a fact about Eliezer Yudkowsky.