5 ms·
Da Vinci had no licenses. Nor Euclid, Nor Einstein. In the long run, licenses are for losers.
by breck 4y ago
Da Vinci had no licenses. Nor Euclid, Nor Einstein.
In the long run, licenses are for losers.
- sebzim4500 4y agoYeah, and there's a reason none of those guys were as rich as e.g. Mark Zuckerburg.
- mr90210 4y agoOk Dude.
- pfisch 4y agoAnd I think we can all agree technical progress under the copyright system is moving much slower than it did back in da vinci's day.... If only we didn't have patents holding us back we would be investing way more in R&D...
- throwayyy479087 4y agoI can’t tell if this is satire, but i literally have autism
- breck 4y agoFine, a modern example: Tim Berners Lee didn't need licenses. Name me someone alive who's innovations are more impactful than his. In the long run, licenses are for losers.
- CaptainNegative 4y agoOpenAI keeps text-davinci-003 proprietary.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- meghan_rain 4y agoHe meant the actual guy