4 ms·
IANAL and I haven't taken a stance on this issue. This isn't really a question of free speech. Every single one of tiktok's users in the US are still free to s
by rolenthedeep 4y ago
IANAL and I haven't taken a stance on this issue.
This isn't really a question of free speech. Every single one of tiktok's users in the US are still free to say whatever they want. The government is banning a business from the country, which I'm sure we've done before.
Everyone is free to exercise all of their first amendment rights, just somewhere else.
Except for tiktok itself I guess, but businesses (particularly foreign ones) don't really get first amendment rights. Their "speech" is heavily regulated for a lot of reasons, mostly very good ones.
The first amendment isn't a magical catch-all for anything we don't like about the government. It protects citizens from retaliation or punishment by the government. For instance, you can't be punished for calling your senator a dickhead, or arrested for drawing a mean cartoon of the president. Even if you want to call banning tiktok censorship, that still doesn't qualify as a 1A issue as tiktok isn't a person or a citizen of the US.
- habith 4y ago> The government is banning a business from the country, which I'm sure we've done before. Ah yes, the great firewall of America. We've finally caught up to the totalitarian regimes that ban Twitter, Facebook, Google, and the rest. What a time to be alive!
- kornhole 4y agoThe law allows banning of ICT products or services. It doesn't matter if it is a profit making business or not. The executive branch makes the determination of which ICT to ban. If the only ones left are the ones the government controls, we lose free speech.