6 ms·
Just so you know who is funding this site: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Council_on_Science_and_Health https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Council_o
by itamarst 4y ago
Just so you know who is funding this site: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Council_on_Science_and_Health https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Council_on_Science_an...
- d23 4y agoCan you summarize the point you're trying to make?
- agnokapathetic 4y ago> Elizabeth M. Whelan (/ˈhwiːlən/; December 4, 1943 – September 11, 2014) was an American epidemiologist best known for promoting science that was favorable to industry and for challenging government regulations of consumer products, food, and pharmaceuticals industries that arose from what she said was "junk science." In 1978, she founded the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH) to provide a formal foundation for her work.
- telotortium 4y agoWhat "industry" is this article being friendly to? The author of the article has written several other articles arguing that acetaminophen is nearly useless and dangerous, so this is a follow-up arguing that an acetaminophen analog engineered to not have the hepatic toxicity of acetaminophen is indeed safe, but no more useful.
- lumb63 4y agoI’ve never heard of this woman before, but you can clearly see by the statements in the Wikipedia page that are made without citing sources, and the overall tone of the article, what Wikipedia thinks about her. Very little media is without bias.
- gumby 4y agoI find the statements about paracetamol (lack of analgesic function, hepatotoxicity) to be unremarkable and don’t find the claims in the article extraordinary. In what way do you think it shows bias?
- evilotto 4y agoOr look at the right column and apply Godwin's Second Law.