4 ms·
I really doubt you understand LLMs at all if you think all they are good for is summarization. You will be shouting at your wall while the world changes outside
by adamsmith143 4y ago
I really doubt you understand LLMs at all if you think all they are good for is summarization. You will be shouting at your wall while the world changes outside.
- rvz 4y ago> I really doubt you understand LLMs at all if you think all they are good for is summarization. A 'counter claim' without giving examples of refuting mine can be dismissed without any further explanation, since my point still remains un-refuted. Summarization of existing text is the only safe killer use-case for LLMs than the rest of the so-called 'applications' and the hype of applying it to everything, where it makes little sense other than attempting to jump on another hype train. I predict that the majority of these ChatGPT-enabled startups will be closing down in the long run, due to no product market fit, easily running out of money or another bigger company over-taking them.
- lostmsu 4y agoThere are samples all around, including it being able to solve newly generated logical puzzles. There was quite a bit about variations of river crossing.
- adamsmith143 4y ago>A 'counter claim' without giving examples of refuting mine can be dismissed without any further explanation, since my point still remains un-refuted. What point, that LLMs are good at nothing other than summarization? That's not a claim arrived at via logic or evidence, it's a poorly thought out opinion that happens to be wrong. There's nothing to refute.