4 ms·
There are already a million ways to run LLaMA. This doesn't change the issue at all, which is that the weights aren't commercially licensed.
by nynx 4y ago
There are already a million ways to run LLaMA. This doesn't change the issue at all, which is that the weights aren't commercially licensed.
- rasbt 4y agoI think some businesses and people are worried about using GPL code in their code bases because that's incompatible with their own licenses.
- theaniketmaurya 4y agoYes, agree that the weights aren't commercially licensed (yet)! The other ways to run LLaMA are using GPL license which makes it difficult for commercial use even if someone trains and upload the weights publicly. This could be a step in for the change :)
- oneshtein 4y agoPlease, train your model on some texts about copyright, licenses, open source licenses, GPL, because it produces nonsense. 1) GPL license is not an engine. It cannot run anything. 2) A product, produced by a code or machine or mechanically, is not copyrightable at all, or it has license of it original source. You can create GPL products on MS Windows using MS compiler. You can create proprietary products on Linux using GNU compiler. A binary output of a program, produced by a compiler such as GCC, is the derivative from it source code, so it has the same license as the source code. The compiler just transforms the text source file into the binary output file. For AI, the situation is the same: AI engine transforms a source data set into a binary file with weights, so binary weights is the derivative from source data set, thus its license is the same as in the original source set. When AI engine runs weights, it transforms an input query into output using also data from the source data set, thus creating a product with mixed content, which must obey licenses from both sources.