4 ms·
I suspect the idea was to discourage instead of entrap/punish. I guess I'm also curious about the rationale, was it a strategic decision, a humane one, or a leg
by burnished 4y ago
I suspect the idea was to discourage instead of entrap/punish. I guess I'm also curious about the rationale, was it a strategic decision, a humane one, or a legal one? All of the above?
Maybe as simple as the action being illegal and since they are not providing the advertised service then no crime is committed? I don't know how broadly applicable this is but in at least one state the local drinking laws boil down to 'you will not serve minors', perhaps something similar here.
- Analemma_ 4y agoIt probably would also help with investigations too. If Joe Bloggs tried to sign up to attack bobsforum.com, got warned off by one of these services, and then a couple weeks later bobsforum.com had an actual attack, they’re probably going to knock on Joe Bloggs’ door first.