3 ms·
The 2nd paragraph of the wikipedia entry on NAIRU mentions it being set at 5-6%. This article shows graphics with similar numbers: https://www.ft.com/content/
by dmn322 4y ago
The 2nd paragraph of the wikipedia entry on NAIRU mentions it being set at 5-6%.
This article shows graphics with similar numbers: https://www.ft.com/content/facf6989-7cd2-3724-a6d4-dfe7c755175f https://www.ft.com/content/facf6989-7cd2-3724-a6d4-dfe7c7551...
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Federal_funds_rate_vs_unemployment_rate.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Federal_funds_rate_v... <-- that's a graph like what I'm talking about. Notice how the blue tends to go up sharply before the grey recession bars. And this tends to happen right as the red line starts to approach 5%. There's an exception recently because trump was in office demanding that they keep the fed rate low, and I guess they decided to listen to him because he was cutting their taxes. But you can tell they didn't love the guy by the way the media covered him. I'm no fan either, but for different reasons.
- pierrebai 4y agoThat wiki graph does not show what you say. There are multiple place in the curve that don't follow your theory. And by places, I mean for example the stretch from 1980 to 2000.