3 ms·
The two comments above you are discussing how this is kind of what workers signed up for when they joined a union. Maybe SB leadership are assholes (and maybe t
by joe4147 4y ago
The two comments above you are discussing how this is kind of what workers signed up for when they joined a union. Maybe SB leadership are assholes (and maybe they are breaking labor laws -- I genuinely don't know much about this topic), and not to call you out specifically, but I see a lot "drive by" comments like these that are just expression of anger, and don't really engage with the story at all. I see a lot of non-programming discussions get buried in this stuff, and it makes HN feel like Reddit. I used to always feel like more likely than not I'd learn things from HN comments.
- giraffe_lady 4y ago[flagged]
- Bloating 4y ago[flagged]
- giraffe_lady 4y ago[flagged]
- ihateyouall123 4y ago[flagged]
- giraffe_lady 4y ago[flagged]
- chimprich 4y agoHN stories about unions always attract low-value comments. I prefer the GP-kind of comments to the elaborate troll replies pretending to understand unionisation ("oh look! Less money! That must have been the sort of thing the workers really wanted when they unionised").
- sangnoir 4y ago"Look what you made me do" - Starbucks Management and/or domestic abusers
- olliej 4y agoThey signed up for their employer breaking the law? "Don't protect your rights or your employer will break the law!"
- FireBeyond 4y ago> and maybe they are breaking labor laws -- I genuinely don't know much about this topic Well, the NLRB, one of the arbiters of labor laws, doesn't say "maybeeeee", it says they _are_ breaking labor laws.