>The use of these "sensitivity readers" is a direct result of the adoption of the "inclusion" directive Then this “inclusion directive” must have been adopted

>The use of these "sensitivity readers" is a direct result of the adoption of the "inclusion" directive Then this “inclusion directive” must have been adopted a very long time ago. Someone else has mentioned that this very book was retitled in 1940 due to its original title including the ’n’ word. One wonders why the apparatchiks aren’t censoring the Daily Telegraph too. The answer, of course, is that their powers of censorship (and indeed their very existence) are largely imaginary. >"Godwinning" does not really apply even though I did mention the Nazi ... Err, ok. You mentioned the Nazis and also made another outrageous historical comparison that's hardly any better considered.