> perhaps in a coarse or low utility way. I think this is right, and a lot of the "this is astrology" people seem to be conflating the fact that something can

> perhaps in a coarse or low utility way. I think this is right, and a lot of the "this is astrology" people seem to be conflating the fact that something can be useful (which, to be clear, I don't believe astrology is) with the fact that something can be misused. > I've never seen someone guess horoscope signs above chance. I've met one person who was David-Blaine-party-trick-level good at this. Out of ~20 people she never met (including me) I think she missed one person's water/earth/fire/air sign, and was probably >80% on guessing their month sign, it was very entertaining.