2 ms·
True. Both effects might true. However the 2 don't cancel each other out probabilitisticly. Given that McCain is so far behind the mere possibility of a Bradley
by dejb 18y ago
True. Both effects might true. However the 2 don't cancel each other out probabilitisticly. Given that McCain is so far behind the mere possibility of a Bradley effect favours him. Let's say both effects are 50% likely to exist and would sway votes by enough to tip the election. Then the results would be
25% Bradley + No Cellphone = McCain wins
50% Bradley + Cellphone = Obama wins
25% No Bradley + Callphone = Obama wins
So in this example McCain now has a 25% chance. Of course this is an exagerated example but hopefully you get the point.