4 ms·
> banning superior foreign products and services mean that people have to use inferior local substitutes. TikTok is only superior in poisoning the minds of peo
by walkhour 4y ago
> banning superior foreign products and services mean that people have to use inferior local substitutes.
TikTok is only superior in poisoning the minds of people using it here in US. That's why the Chinese version is different. I think zero is lost if people use the inferior local ones in this case.
> This logic is "they make themselves worse off, so we should match them". That is lose-lose scenario logic.
Sure, the optimal solution for the prisoner's dilemma is that both cooperate. But once one doesn't cooperate, the optimal solution is not to cooperate. US looks like a dummy waving the flag of morality while China laughs in its face.
- t-writescode 4y agoTikTok is superior in rapidly distributing relatively niche information to enormous quantities of interested parties. I believe the current recommended example is "Go look up France on TikTok vs look up France on Instagram" Addendum: TikTok is also superior at dynamically generating an advertisable collective that are specifically interested and desiring of the ads they're given. Five million small businesses found their place on TikTok entirely because they found their 2000-person size niche that would be interested in buying their product, and even encouraged them to buy it.
- hooverd 4y agoPersonally, I think TikTok is just responding to market forces in America. It's clearly delivering what people want in an app.
- andrekandre 4y ago> poisoning the minds of people using it here in US in what way is tiktok poisoning the minds of people?