2 ms·
Given the low quality results of the humans, I suspect they were paying too low and the workers were giving low quality answers. I wonder if they should have pa
by 8organicbits 4y ago
Given the low quality results of the humans, I suspect they were paying too low and the workers were giving low quality answers. I wonder if they should have paid more per task to get a better comparison.
It doesn't feel surprising that GPT is cheaper and more accurate than a human who is randomly clicking buttons. Custom software can already do that.