3 ms·
"the government seems to show less and less restraint in exchange for instant gratification and short term benefits" I'm not sure whether you're talking about
by dmn322 4y ago
"the government seems to show less and less restraint in exchange for instant gratification and short term benefits"
I'm not sure whether you're talking about raising the rates or reducing them. But the idea that reducing rates is just instant gratification is just false. The rates simply dictate how willing banks will be to loan money out. It's a tool. Countries have used this to spur foreign demand of their goods for years. Portugal Italy and Greece used to do it all the time. Once they joined the Euro and they were no longer able to inflate at will, their economies tanked.
It's better to think of money like shares. The total amount of shares outstanding doesn't really affect much... it's the relative proportions that people control and the percentage of equity that those shares represent that matters.
- carlosjobim 4y ago> It's better to think of money like shares. The total amount of shares outstanding doesn't really affect much... it's the relative proportions that people control and the percentage of equity that those shares represent that matters. Inflation is not evenly distributed. Newly created money goes to the rulers first, then to their lords and vassals etc. The people who actually produce in the economy are the last to receive the new money after it has been completely diluted.
- chrischattin 4y agoThis comment is wrong on all points.
- dmn322 4y agoWell I got the info from a talk by the head of Italy's central bank 12 or 13 years ago.