3 ms·
I live in a very small island where the main industry has been cattle (meat and milk production) for several decades. If the urine of the cows was toxic, the is
by cfn 4y ago
I live in a very small island where the main industry has been cattle (meat and milk production) for several decades. If the urine of the cows was toxic, the island would have been deserted a long time ago. It is as green as it has ever been, just lookup the Azores for some pictures.
It is true that lot feeds and industrialized cattle production create massive amounts of pollution but so does industrialized agriculture. The problem is on the how and not on the what (see Joel Salatin for a good example).
- fredrikholm 4y agoCheers; you're right. 'En masse' wasn't sufficient in communicating what I wanted, which was to say "in large, repeated and undiluted amounts". > The problem is on the how and not on the what If we could realistically supply the entire demand for beef with cows grazing on fields on the same amount of land, without raising the price directly or by subsidizing the cost, I'd be all in. This is literally impossible as industrialized cattle production is that much more efficient, no matter how revoltingly disgusting it is.
- cfn 4y agoPretty much all the beef production is done in grazing fields as it is cheaper and less work. It is only the bulk up that is done in feed lots (1-3 months before going to the abbatoir). There is even pasture finished beef production where cows stay in the fields without feed until the end.
- fredrikholm 4y agoIs there any data on that? I meet quite a bit of animal-activist types (by association) that 'expose' parts of the meat industry by taking jobs and secretly filming (as it's often illegal to do). Most of the extreme horrors they've recorded are in slaughterhouses, but I have vivid memories of seeing cattle confined in small cages which fecal infected infections. Perhaps that's dairy production, as it doesn't affect the outcome (as much)?
- QuarterReptile 4y agoProbably not publicly available data, except in looking at the various flows of cattle. A common one is pasture to weaning, then pasture 'stocking operations, totalling one year, followed by 3 months in feedlot. I suspect you could find cattle that spend as much as 50% of their lives in confined feeding operations, but that's a guess, and obviously I couldn't say how prevalent. The 'animal rights' activists clearly insinuate that feedlots are all there is; that seems never to be the case. The actual fractions are moving targets. Even small direct-to-consumer outfits selling quarters and larger (common in Virginia) tend to finish on grain because it makes the meat more palatable.
- fredrikholm 4y agoThank you for taking the time; I learned some stuff today. Cheers!
- marliechiller 4y agothats... not how toxicity is working in this sense and your anecdote doesnt disprove what he is saying. Another anecdote - I went surfing at the end of last summer and was advised not to go into the sea as there had been heavy rains up the valley which had washed refuse off the fields and into the estuary. Lots of people who ignored the advice got sick that day as it turns out the runoff is toxic.
- cfn 4y agoAt least I have an anecdote that produces a large percentage of the beef and dairy consumed in Portugal. I fail to see proper data from anyone else showing the contrary elsewhere.