4 ms·

I think the point the authors of the article were trying to make was that the Fed has operated for 90 years and never lost money. We've been through multiple fi

by kyrra 4y ago

I think the point the authors of the article were trying to make was that the Fed has operated for 90 years and never lost money. We've been through multiple financial crisis and not been in the situation. They are implying the current said is doing a poor job of running things.

autoexec 4y ago
> We've been through multiple financial crisis and not been in the situation. It's not as if any of those previous financial crises are comparable to what we're going through now though. These are very different times where we're coming out of unprecedented events. Maybe the Fed really is doing poorly, but I can't exactly remember a time in my life when everybody loved the Fed and what they were doing either. Is there some kind of golden age when everything was being handled correctly and we didn't have problems that we should be trying to go back to?
- qeternity 4y ago
  We had a bubble in 2008 (not new) and a pretty mild pandemic in 2020 (also not new). In the early 20th century we fought two World Wars. The only thing unprecedented is the scale of the Fed’s operations these days.
  - epgui 4y ago
    If I remember correctly, I think my History textbooks are a bit longer than that. I suspect this comment might not contain all of the information!
spaceman_2020 4y ago
It’s unreal to me that an unelected bunch of bankers at the Fed have such an outsized impact on the global economy, and yet when anyone challenges them, half the people actually defend them. If there is any institution that should be under constant and heavy scrutiny at all times, it should be the Fed.
- baq 4y ago
  imagine the mess if there were elections for central bankers. fiscal authority is sort of elected. you really want somebody different in monetary authority...
- blagie 4y ago
  From my vintage, among the most competent governing institutions are the Supreme Court and the Fed, neither of which has any oversight. I'm not claiming any sort of perfection, but compared to congress, it's like night-and-day. It'd be interesting to understand how and why. That's not true of all institutions without oversight.
  - cheeseomlit 4y ago
    I'm of the exact opposite opinion, I see those two groups as some of the absolute most harmful in modern US politics. I'll take a gridlocked congress over an activist SCOTUS legislating from the bench or an out of control Fed printing trillions of dollars for their banker friends any day of the week, though I suppose the gridlocked congress is part of what enables that behavior
- epgui 4y ago
  > If there is any institution that should be under constant and heavy scrutiny at all times, it should be the Fed. First, I want to say that I agree with you 100% here. I even think maybe the accountability mechanisms might not be designed correctly, although I don't know enough to be sure. > half the people actually defend them In their defence though (and notwithstanding what I said above), they're all incredibly intelligent and competent professionals who happen to be at the helm of the ship in uncertain times. :shrug:

by kyrra 4y ago

autoexec 4y ago

> We've been through multiple financial crisis and not been in the situation. It's not as if any of those previous financial crises are comparable to what we're going through now though. These are very different times where we're coming out of unprecedented events. Maybe the Fed really is doing poorly, but I can't exactly remember a time in my life when everybody loved the Fed and what they were doing either. Is there some kind of golden age when everything was being handled correctly and we didn't have problems that we should be trying to go back to?

qeternity 4y ago
We had a bubble in 2008 (not new) and a pretty mild pandemic in 2020 (also not new). In the early 20th century we fought two World Wars. The only thing unprecedented is the scale of the Fed’s operations these days.
- epgui 4y ago
  If I remember correctly, I think my History textbooks are a bit longer than that. I suspect this comment might not contain all of the information!

spaceman_2020 4y ago

It’s unreal to me that an unelected bunch of bankers at the Fed have such an outsized impact on the global economy, and yet when anyone challenges them, half the people actually defend them. If there is any institution that should be under constant and heavy scrutiny at all times, it should be the Fed.

baq 4y ago
imagine the mess if there were elections for central bankers. fiscal authority is sort of elected. you really want somebody different in monetary authority...
blagie 4y ago
From my vintage, among the most competent governing institutions are the Supreme Court and the Fed, neither of which has any oversight. I'm not claiming any sort of perfection, but compared to congress, it's like night-and-day. It'd be interesting to understand how and why. That's not true of all institutions without oversight.
- cheeseomlit 4y ago
  I'm of the exact opposite opinion, I see those two groups as some of the absolute most harmful in modern US politics. I'll take a gridlocked congress over an activist SCOTUS legislating from the bench or an out of control Fed printing trillions of dollars for their banker friends any day of the week, though I suppose the gridlocked congress is part of what enables that behavior
epgui 4y ago
> If there is any institution that should be under constant and heavy scrutiny at all times, it should be the Fed. First, I want to say that I agree with you 100% here. I even think maybe the accountability mechanisms might not be designed correctly, although I don't know enough to be sure. > half the people actually defend them In their defence though (and notwithstanding what I said above), they're all incredibly intelligent and competent professionals who happen to be at the helm of the ship in uncertain times. :shrug: