3 ms·
I guess my surprise is that the machine is only 20x cheaper than the cheapest human available.
by calvinmorrison 4y ago
I guess my surprise is that the machine is only 20x cheaper than the cheapest human available.
- sebzim4500 4y agoGiven how badly the humans performed, I suspect a lot of them are either not bothering to read the prompt or using a worse bot than ChatGPT. Not surprsing they are so cheap. If you tried to pay people to do it properly then presumably it would cost much more.
- ummonk 4y agoIt’s worse because a US-based MTurker is far from the cheapest human available.
- taberiand 4y agoHey, with any luck, running one of these bots with the capability to replace me will cost just as much as hiring me. (Ha! As if. Costs are only going to come down)
- whitemary 4y agoAgainst the cost of living in the US, workers in the US are about as cheap as they come, second to maybe sweatshop workers in free trade zones or slaves in Dubai.
- exitb 4y agoChatGPT costs the same, regardless of the difficulty of the task, which is not the case for humans.