3 ms·

Sorry if I have to ask, what part is not 100% true? You mean that padrino app can be still faster with large app? You said there are more than "Hello World" be

by nyrb 15y ago

Sorry if I have to ask, what part is not 100% true? You mean that padrino app can be still faster with large app? You said there are more than "Hello World" benchmarks? I looked at the link that you provided and then looked at this source code of the Padrino app and its still "Hello World": https://github.com/DAddYE/web-frameworks-benchmark/blob/more_advanced/padrino/app/controllers/main.rb https://github.com/DAddYE/web-frameworks-benchmark/blob/more... I expected to see something more than just Hello World app. I am trying to see why you are suggesting me that Padrino is better than Rails. :-) Sounds like you are completely against Rails. Maybe I am wrong.

DAddYEz 15y ago
It's quite complicated make a full featured app for all webframeworks, btw look at here: https://github.com/DAddYE/web-frameworks-benchmark/blob/more_advanced/padrino/app/controllers/main.rb#L7 https://github.com/DAddYE/web-frameworks-benchmark/blob/more... Which is: https://github.com/DAddYE/web-frameworks-benchmark/blob/more_advanced/padrino/app/views/index.haml https://github.com/DAddYE/web-frameworks-benchmark/blob/more... With a layout: https://github.com/DAddYE/web-frameworks-benchmark/blob/more_advanced/padrino/app/views/layouts/application.haml https://github.com/DAddYE/web-frameworks-benchmark/blob/more... Not a very very complex use case but a bit more than a `hello world` app. I love Rails, Im using i.e. ActiveRecord in 90% of my projects. Beside that I ported 162 apps over Padrino not because I've free time to spend but because I need decent performances (without kongfu with mem/redis caching) with less memory usage. Try to browse rails (minus ActiveRecord) source code and padrino source code to understand what I mean.