3 ms·

> it was long waterfall chains of terrible javascript loaders > Well, not end users. They're getting ads. Why not? Would you prefer ads, or ads with terrible

> it was long waterfall chains of terrible javascript loaders > Well, not end users. They're getting ads. Why not? Would you prefer ads, or ads with terrible javascript loaders?

HWR_14 4y ago
I would prefer ads with terrible javascript loaders, as they are easier to more completely and reliably block.
- selcuka 4y ago
  The ads still use javascript; they are just not as "terrible" (a.k.a. waterfall).
  - HWR_14 4y ago
    The waterfall ones were easier to detect and block, IIRC.