Their point was that the US media downplays its own atrocities while playing up those of its enemies. Their statements seem reasonable in that context. What yo

Their point was that the US media downplays its own atrocities while playing up those of its enemies. Their statements seem reasonable in that context. What you’re claiming is outright denial is more like hedging, and an open admission that they don’t trust the source. It reflects poor judgment on his part, but what you’re arguing isn’t in good faith. Denying the holocaust today is reprehensible. Denying it in 1943 was understandable, given the limited facts at the time. Similarly, denying the Cambodian genocide in a book in 1979, literally right in the middle of it, isn’t the same as denying it today.