4 ms·
> No, it's not exhausted - people and businesses pushing heavyweight frameworks stand to lose out, and trying to silence the debate would help them. What do yo
by kitkat_new 4y ago
> No, it's not exhausted - people and businesses pushing heavyweight frameworks stand to lose out, and trying to silence the debate would help them.
What do you think about frameworks like Leptos that take the best of both worlds?
> progressively-enhanced single-page apps that are rendered on the server and then hydrated on the client, enhancing your <a> and <form> navigations and mutations seamlessly when WASM is available.
https://docs.rs/leptos/latest/leptos/ https://docs.rs/leptos/latest/leptos/
- benatkin 4y agoI think they're pretty neat, and that Svelte is one. "I used this technique in my own emoji-picker-element. If you’re already using Svelte in your project, then you can import 'emoji-picker-element/svelte' and get a version that doesn’t bundle its own framework, ensuring de-duplication. This saves a paltry 1.4 kB out of 13.9 kB total (compressed), but hey, it’s there. (Potentially I could make this the default behavior, but I like the bundled version for the benefit of folks who use <script> tags instead of bundlers. Maybe something like Skypack could make this simpler in the future.)" https://nolanlawson.com/2021/08/01/why-its-okay-for-web-components-to-use-frameworks/ https://nolanlawson.com/2021/08/01/why-its-okay-for-web-comp... Thing is I actually like coding in Vanilla JS, at least some of the time.