4 ms·
Googler, but opinion are my own. More than that, I believe we will hit a ceiling when the impossibility of these models to incorporate causality becomes eviden
by marcyb5st 4y ago
Googler, but opinion are my own.
More than that, I believe we will hit a ceiling when the impossibility of these models to incorporate causality becomes evident.
Right now, LLMs are trained by predicting the next word given a context (the prompt). This approach, IMHO, gives a resemblance of cause/effect because the training data is made by humans and obviously we are able to express ourselves and reason in those terms. So we have a poor proxy for that which, also IMHO, partially explains why LLMs performance degrades when asked to solve novel problems (there was an entry few days ago about this).
- akiselev 4y agoAfter seeing LangChain and the reasoning paper I think it's fairly obvious that we're just starting to scratch the surface of AI architectures, dictated largely by scalability of GPU resources. The LLMs we're playing with are at best the proof of concept of what will eventually be the message passing for the next generation of models.
- forhadahmed 4y agoLinks please.. 1) langchain paper? 2) reasoning paper? Thanks!