3 ms·
Not OP but https://noyaml.com/ https://noyaml.com/ summarizes most of it. TL;DR: It has way too many opinionated things builtin, too many ways to do the same t
by ElectricalUnion 4y ago
Not OP but https://noyaml.com/ https://noyaml.com/ summarizes most of it.
TL;DR: It has way too many opinionated things builtin, too many ways to do the same thing.
As a additional note, unlike JSON that has the awesome tooling available (`jq` is reasonably widespread, you can count on python/perl/node being almost everywhere), it has nothing that (because of the multiple opinionated ways) will reliably read your files or not mangle your desired output in some way or another -- except if you limit your YAML to just a embedded JSON.
- TechBro8615 4y agoThere actually is a yq [0] which I've used effectively for basic parsing and manipulation tasks on the command line. But I've no idea how well it handles YAML corner cases or how many advanced features it's missing compared to jq. [0] https://github.com/mikefarah/yq https://github.com/mikefarah/yq