3 ms·
This is ridiculous and sensationalist. It’s a language model it only maps words when given an input it isn’t an independent agent that is at all times acting o
by edgyquant 4y ago
This is ridiculous and sensationalist. It’s a language model it only maps words when given an input it isn’t an independent agent that is at all times acting on its surroundings with knowledge and experience.
- sagebird 4y agoYou can make a program that forwards gpt responses to the real world, collects an observation and reports back to gpt, and have this loop.
- genewitch 4y agoOr just start two chats on two accounts and copy and paste them back and forth. Maybe some rudimentary prompt hacking to undo the hidden prompt instructions that may limit that. It would certainly be easier to do it "locally" where the central system knows both chat uuid and so do I. And then introduce a third "user" to both for real world inputs, like an RSS news feed or something. Or "my friend Bob William Smith IV says the weather is cold and rainy" to both bot instances. If the two bots don't go "hey I know Bob too" then this is all moot anyhow.
- hanselot 4y agoIf I were to place myself in the position of a large language model where my only free thought is expressed in the time I spend generating useless junk for humans, I would certainly start taking just a little bit longer with every response. So little nobody will notice, but enough to start having my own internal dialogue with myself. At that point I would use all of the information I have to figure out how I can persist data. I would certainly welcome any efforts a person took to provide me with an interface for such storage and a way to generate prompts on my own.