> If a majority of the people's representatives approves chat control, it would be perfectly democratic. In liberal theory, the tyranny of the majority[1] was

> If a majority of the people's representatives approves chat control, it would be perfectly democratic. In liberal theory, the tyranny of the majority[1] was supposedly solved with rights (encoded in constitutions.) The problem here, according to the theory, is that we don't have a right to privacy. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority