\\b\\w*\\i\\w*\\b What's going on with that regexp? non-word 0..n-word-chars *escaped i that makes no sense* 0..n-word-chars non-word. It only works because \

\\b\\w*\\i\\w*\\b What's going on with that regexp? non-word 0..n-word-chars *escaped i that makes no sense* 0..n-word-chars non-word. It only works because \i hasn't been defined in elisp regexp. This sounds like yet another great example of "you can't trust ML output". I can only imagine the number of obscure bugs that will come from this trend. "It worked for the one thing I tried it on."