3 ms·
You don’t need to pull in dependencies if you don’t want to. But if you do, the contracts on ownership enforced by the compiler allows the software to compose
by nindalf 4y ago
You don’t need to pull in dependencies if you don’t want to.
But if you do, the contracts on ownership enforced by the compiler allows the software to compose better.
- childintime 4y agoYou're a Rust zealot? The point still stands: for lots of projects 95% of the code pulled in is not actually used, but is still cause for breakage. Of the worst kind, because it has nothing to do with the problem being solved. Sorry, but the build system just gave up, for no good reason at all. Only total perfection is acceptable to Rust, and that is also it's Achilles heel, well exemplified by this case. Now Rust could change and be more flexible, and I would have great faith in its leadership to find a way, if not for people like you, who charge ahead on a straw man and ex-communicate.
- avgcorrection 4y ago# First rule of zealotry Whoever is first to throw out the zealot accusation is himself/herself the zealot.
- nindalf 4y agoReally weird that my innocuous comment would prompt such a visceral response. Not cool.