3 ms·
That comparison seems unfair... AWS has a habit of launching early and iterating, and they almost never shut stuff down. In this case it's a filesystem implemen
by sudhirj 4y ago
That comparison seems unfair... AWS has a habit of launching early and iterating, and they almost never shut stuff down. In this case it's a filesystem implementation of a HTTP API, so the capabilities reflect the main API. Deciding to build and launch reads before writes isn't really a bad decision, it helps those who have the read use case try this out and give feedback immediately.
- ochoseis 4y ago> In this case it's a filesystem implementation of a HTTP API When you put it like that, it makes me wonder why they don't support WebDAV.
- sudhirj 4y agoI think there’s a bunch of gateways available already. The example use case for this seems to be mounting a 10 petabyte “hard drive” with CSVs to a reporting machine.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]