4 ms·

I'm philosophically comfortable with the notion that some things are unknowable and that eventually one just has to take certain cornerstone propositions about

I'm philosophically comfortable with the notion that some things are unknowable and that eventually one just has to take certain cornerstone propositions about the nature of reality on trust and / or faith. Ultimately though the question is irrelevant to the discussion at hand, as the claim I'm making is that physical reality is at a lower level than socio economic reality (which I'll give you is a contested claim these days)

IIAOPSW 4y ago
Yes, the systems we construct within this reality are obviously not the bottom of the stack because we built the stack. But suppose the trading bots figure out how to manipulate the rounding mechanics of high frequency trading to jerry rig a Turing machine within their reality. Now fast forward from this and suppose they've all obtained an equivalent of a home PC. For fun they all start playing a "sim city" like game version of our reality. So far as they can tell, money is real reality (rather than socio-economic construct), and the "physical" reality is an abstract game constructed at a higher level. So who's reality is who's construct in the end?