2 ms·
Agreed. But I'd like to perhaps interpret it a slightly different way. What if house construction was "branded". That is, aside from (possibly uninforced) local
by chiefalchemist 4y ago
Agreed. But I'd like to perhaps interpret it a slightly different way. What if house construction was "branded". That is, aside from (possibly uninforced) local standards a company built homes AND committed to their quality.
Given how sloppy new home construction has become, perhaps buyers would trade less home for say 10 years of peace of mind? I realize long term guarantees are tough. Obviously. Nonetheless, the current shit-show seems to be begging for alternatives.
- tstrimple 4y agoHome warranties were fairly common when purchasing. They are meant to cover things you don't find right away during the inspection. Unfortunately market forces, especially lately, have made these less available for purchasers as competition for houses is too high.
- chiefalchemist 4y agoSounds like it's a race to the bottom. No one can differentiate with better quality goods and work because no one is willing and able to do it. The lower the price the better. Regardless how it'll cost you later, affect long term value, etc. If anything it makes the argument to not buy new. Instead go for something in the 10 to 15 yr range that's had the structural bugs worked out but might need updated appliances.