4 ms·
>No, in an evolving situation you don't lie, you say "we don't know", or "we are hoping this will help". No, in an evolving situation you explain the facts as
by operatingthetan 4y ago
>No, in an evolving situation you don't lie, you say "we don't know", or "we are hoping this will help".
No, in an evolving situation you explain the facts as you currently know them. Why else would they have walked it back days later if it was a lie? You don't make any sense.
>It was never true and they knew it wasn't true.
Ah, I see you're quite happy to make stuff up in the absense of actual facts. You have nothing to demonstrate it as a lie, you easily make that leap because it suits your narrative. So again, you don't understand what a lie is.
- yucky 4y ago> No, in an evolving situation you explain the facts as you currently know them. I'm not sure if you're intentionally missing the point here, so I'll restate the obvious: There was never a data set that ever indicated at any time that vaccinated people couldn't get or spread the virus. Therefore, stating that vaccinated people didn't carry the virus was a lie. For it not to have been a lie, they would have had to base the idea that vaccinated people don't carry the virus on some sort of data that indicated that. Except, there has never been data to suggest vaccinated people don't carry virus. Since no data ever indicated that vaccinated people couldn't carry the virus, stating that as a fact was a lie.