4 ms·
Sure, once we have a universal way to accomplish the task that's easier and safer.
by chrsig 4y ago
Sure, once we have a universal way to accomplish the task that's easier and safer.
- omniglottal 4y agoAnsible provides a module to install OS packages. It works with apt, yum, dnf, pacman, etc. This is just one of the implementation wrappers around a universal way to accomplish the task. This same mechanism also allows uninstallations and relies on the OS to manage dependencies, which it does. This one true way necessitates the "OS package manager" being the way for an OS to manage packages. This exists, and tools exist to eliminate the need to memorize how to do these processes like update, remove, reinstall, rollback, etc. It also centralizes into one config Nd workflow your very limited number of trusted parties, what their GPG keys are, and how to validate, rescind, and securely handle and use those keys. It handles digest verification, sha sum validation, etc. One way to do this exists by as many names as there are distro families, but it's one way nevertheless. This way, with these keys, stored under the security postures built and refined over decades, exists. The people complaining that this one way should be used turn out to have a valid point, and your suggestion is important, so it sounds like you're in agreement: let's use the OS package manager when installing OS packages. This way should be foremost, recommended, and most prominent. It's easier and safer. Do you disagree?