> He was not asked for evidence. Think why. Because he has none, obviously. I'm sorry, was this supposed to be witty? If the author's conclusions are so obviou

> He was not asked for evidence. Think why. Because he has none, obviously. I'm sorry, was this supposed to be witty? If the author's conclusions are so obvious then presenting evidence should be easy. > Many people do. You don’t. I'm obviously talking about your personal negative experience of small town life. Argue about the environmental effects of urban sprawl all you want, but trust me when I say that precisely zero people are going to move to the city because you didn't like your neighbors that one time you lived in suburbia. That's what nobody gives a shit about. Do you realize how staggeringly narcissistic it is to present that as a reason other people should abandon rural life? "Chocolate ice cream should be outlawed because it's bad for the environment AND because I don't like the way it tastes." Do you not see anything patently fucking ridiculous about that statement?