4 ms·
"AI" is never going to be as effective at it as "me + AI". That's what people said about chess ai.
by theLiminator 4y ago
"AI" is never going to be as effective at it as "me + AI".
That's what people said about chess ai.
- User23 4y agoHas Magnus or a similarly good player ever played against an AI using an AI to assist him? That sounds like it could be interesting.
- williadc 4y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlsen%E2%80%93Niemann_controversy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlsen%E2%80%93Niemann_contro... This is not exactly what you asked, but it shows that high-level players are using AI to play better chess.
- elevatortrim 4y agoHmm, there would be no point at this stage as there are no positions AI is not certain to have found at least as good a move as a human.
- sdenton4 4y agoThis is called centaur chess. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_chess https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_chess As I understand it, chess ai just does better without dumb humans to overrule it these days.
- ZephyrBlu 4y agoChess is not a team sport.
- lisasays 4y agoNot comparable - that's a very limited slice of AI we're talking about.
- Nevermark 4y agoYes, a very limited AI still devalued all that a human brought to the table. Now AI models are getting both more general, and deepening their comprehension, at the same time. Rapidly. If there are highly talented humans in your field today who would find your extra help more of a distraction than a help, then it’s likely more advanced models will to. Not being critical. This applies to me too. All of us!