4 ms·
> What about growing stuff closer to where they are going to be eaten You want to reduce the carbon footprint of your food? Focus on what you eat, not whether
by myshpa 4y ago
> What about growing stuff closer to where they are going to be eaten
You want to reduce the carbon footprint of your food? Focus on what you eat, not whether your food is local
Transport is a small contributor to emissions. For most food products, it accounts for less than 10%, and it’s much smaller for the largest GHG emitters. In beef from beef herds, it’s 0.5%.
Very little food is air-freighted; it accounts for only 0.16% of food miles.
Many of the foods people assume to come by air are actually transported by boat – avocados and almonds are prime examples. Shipping one kilogram of avocados from Mexico to the United Kingdom would generate ... only around 8% of avocados’ total footprint. Even when shipped at great distances, its emissions are much less than locally-produced animal products.
https://ourworldindata.org/food-choice-vs-eating-local https://ourworldindata.org/food-choice-vs-eating-local
- dopidopHN 4y agoOh, yes. Absolutely. Sorry I realized that’s I was internalizing that. I don’t eat much meat, if ever. Great resources, too. At this point, I think we should do both of course. Eating food that make sense, and growing it locally when it’s sensible. For instance olive and wallnuts would replace avocado and almond in my particular location.