> Suddenly the goalposts moved so that it has to have happened "totally" and "thus far" to qualify as taking their jobs? I was asking a question. I don't think

> Suddenly the goalposts moved so that it has to have happened "totally" and "thus far" to qualify as taking their jobs? I was asking a question. I don't think anyone can confidently quantify the effects of AI at this point so I was seeing if I was missing something. What I said is just some word vomit about what I'm seeing on the ground as an engineer. I'm happy to accept a refutation as we gather more concrete data. The reason I asked the question the way I did is because as I stated there is no doubt AI will impact our jobs, but I'm understandably more concerned about less jobs because of AI. I also have the experience of writing a lot of automation, and hearing this same style of rhetoric when we started doing that heavily. For all the scare around automation, it did end fact end up creating more jobs and typically made lives easier. Jumping to "shifting goalposts" over that is pretty trash conversation.