That's good, a lot of machine-generated art can be good at compelling human emotion. This was true before ChatGPT existed, and you shouldn't feel bad about appr

That's good, a lot of machine-generated art can be good at compelling human emotion. This was true before ChatGPT existed, and you shouldn't feel bad about appreciating aesthetic beauty. However, I think it's worth reconciling the parent's point with your own worldview. You may feel attached to these LLMs, but that's mostly because they're designed as affirmation boxes. They fill-in-the-blank with whichever token the sampler passes to them, it really is that simple. Humans and AI can arrive at the same outcome (circumstantially), but they will use different means to go about it. ChatGPT and it's contemporary LLMs do not have a model of self. They're good at convincing you otherwise, and it's completely fine to ascribe human emotion to that writing - but you should at least acknowledge that it's just writing.